Comprehensive knowledge of emergency contraception does not always result in improved use of the method: evidence from women attending an unplanned pregnancy clinic

Comprehensive knowledge of emergency contraception does not always result

in improved use of the method: evidence from women attending an unplanned

pregnancy clinic

E. Acha, N. Mullin

Highfield Clinic, Widnes, Cheshire, UK

Background: Emergency contraception (EC) provides a safe and effective

means of preventing at least 75% of expected pregnancies resulting from

unprotected sexual intercourse. Knowledge of emergency contraception is crucial

to its proper use. In the United Kingdom (UK) there is increasing awareness of

this method but estimates of use are low; and there were 175,600 abortions in

England and Wales in 2002.

Objectives: To discover the extent of knowledge and use of EC in women

attending a dedicated unplanned pregnancy clinic.

Design and method: A review of the literature suggested that we could

expect 20% of women to have correct knowledge of EC. An anonymous questionnaire

was offered to all women attending for their appointment at the clinic and it

was completed in the waiting room prior to the consultation.

Results: There was a 100% response rate (222 women). We found 39%

(87/222) were under age 20 and over two-thirds (77%, 171/222) of the group

described themselves as single. Of the women, 97% (215/222) admitted being aware

of EC and 65% (116/178) knew the correct time frame for use (within 3 days);

however, 44 respondents did not answer this particular question. We found 68%

(152/222) of the sample were using contraception at the probable time of

conception, when 40% (89/222) were aware of a failure of their regular method or

unprotected sexual intercourse occurred in barrier contraception users. Very few

of this alerted group obtained EC (17%, 15/89) and no-one else in the sample

admitted using it. So, only 6.8% (15/222) of the whole sample obtained EC on

this occasion even when 58% (128/222) had used EC previously.

Conclusion: The majority of women attending the unplanned pregnancy

clinic had heard of EC, knew how to use it correctly and could all give examples

of where to obtain EC. However, only a tiny proportion of this group of women

actually took EC, even when over half of them recognised a possible or actual

failure of their contraceptive method and risk of pregnancy. The decision making

process influencing a woman’s use of EC is obviously complex, with more than

just factual knowledge being important. Advance prescribing may be one possible

solution to improve accessibility of EC and may increase effective use of EC.

Scroll to Top