The Sandyford Health Screen – enhancing service provision within the community sexual health service in Glasgow

The Sandyford Health Screen – enhancing service provision within the

community sexual health service in Glasgow

T. Groom, A. Bigrigg, C. Thow

The Sandyford Initiative, Glasgow, UK

Objectives: To ascertain the needs of the attending population in

order to better assign resources and improve services.

Design & Methods: The Sandyford Initiative is a joint sexual

health service which combines family planning (FP) and genitourinary medical

services (GUM) in Glasgow. The Sandyford Health Screen (SaHS) is a voluntary

questionnaire completed by clinical staff on behalf of consenting patients. Its

aims are to document significant social and emotional issues over and above the

primary reason for presentation to Sandyford. Giving an opportunity to highlight,

and improve access to, a wide range of services within Sandyford and locally in

Glasgow. In addition it expects to increase Chlamydia screening, and to provide

information to further develop services. This is an ongoing initiative and is

continuously being evaluated and developed. We will present some of the data we

have elicited over a six month period, April 2003 to September 2003.

Results: 3710 Sandyford health screens were performed between 01/04/03

and 30/09/03, 74% of whom were female.

Attending Service FP % GUM %
Women with 2 or more partners in the previous year  24 40
Men with 2 or more partners in the previous year  64 60
Male respondents admitted to never using a condom  34 30
Respondents admitted to having been forced to have sex at some

time 

5 1.5
Women expressed concern regarding their menses  14 4
Women expressed concern regarding urinary incontinence  3 3
Women wished to discuss a previous miscarriage, stillbirth or

termination  

5 2

2% of men wished for further information regarding testicular examination.

2975 Chlamydia screens were performed in the family planning service, as

compared to 1764 for the same time period in 2002. 5.9% of patients screened in

FP were Chlamydia positive, as compared with 4.8% for the same time period for

2002.

Conclusions: The Sandyford health screen has increased the

identification of cases of chlamydia particularly in the family planning setting

and therefore allowed an increase in treatment, counselling, and partner

participation. This gives us the opportunity for education and to reduce the

infective pool within the community. Knowledge of sexual partners and safe sex

also allows targeted health promotion. Numerous issues of concern to clients

have been raised by the Sandyford health screen, and this information is helping

to inform the strategic development of services, in order to provide an

increasingly holistic model of sexual health care.

Scroll to Top