Attitudes toward contraception in three different populations

 

Attitudes toward contraception in three different populations

P. Tsikouras(1), G. Galazios(1), N. Koutlaki (1), M. Emin (1),

V. Liberis (1), G. Maroulis (1), A. T. Teichmann(2).

Department

of Obstetrics and Gynecology Democritus University of Thrace,Greece.(1)

Department

of Obstetrics and Gynecology Aschaffenburg,Germany.(2)

Introduction: The integration of contraception into a

woman‘s concept of life strongly depends on different customs, different

religions and cultures, moral and ethical codes, behavioral manners and

practices. Avoiding an unwanted pregnancy and subsequent pregnancy termination

interacts closely with social and family policies. The aim of the present study

was to explore contraceptive behavior of women belonging to three different

ethnic and/or religious populations. We also intented to draw conclusions on

social and economic parameters influencing female attitude towards contraception

as well as to evaluate the main sources of information concerning contraception

in each population.

Material and Methods: The study included representatives

from three female subgroups: 140 Christian Orthodox living in Thrace (group C),

120 Muslims living in Thrace ( group B ), and 150 Muslims living in Germany (group

A). Participants from each group were asked to answer a detailed questionnaire

extensively, concerning data, socio-economic status, sexual activity and

contraceptive practices. Statistical analysis was performed using one way

analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Turkey _ s test, chi-square test and

multiple logistic regression analysis.

Results: The three groups were compared in terms of age

(p=0.904) and residence place (p=0.499), but not in terms of social status

(p<0.001), standing partner (p=0.012) and occupation (p<0.001). The Contraceptive pill (41.7%), the condom (35.1%), periodic abstinence (24.4%) and interrupted coitus (21.5%) were the most common methods of contraception, with the contraceptive pill being the most prevalent method among Muslims from Germany (50.0%), Christians from Greece (54.3%) and the periodic abstinence among Muslims from Greece (39.2%). The gynaecologist (23.4%), the family consultant (12.0%) and the partner (10.2%) were the most usual sources of information.

The use of the contraceptive pill was more frequent among

Muslims from Germany and Christians from Greece (p<0.001), as well as among unmarried women with a partner (p=0.021), while the use of the condom was more frequent among Christians from Greece (p=0.019) and women living in rural areas (p=0.038) and less frequent among unmarried women with a partner (p=0.022).

Muslims from Thrace were more likely to practice periodic

abstinence and interrupted coitus (both p<0.001). Interrupted coitus was also frequent among unemployed women (p=0.009). The use of IUD was more frequent among Muslims from Germany or Greece (p=0.039), while spermicides were more frequent among women younger than 25 years old (p=0.028), unmarried women with or without a partner (p=0.012) and students (p=0.012). Finally, the use of the diaphragm was more common among Christians from Greece (p=0.002), women younger than 25 years old (p=0.026) and students (p=0.001).

Conclusions: Our study results reveal that there are

behavioral differences between race/ethnicity and minority groups regarding

contraceptive practices, that the gynecologist is a major participant in the

development of the womens’ concept and that reliable contraception supports

and facilitates lifestyle and provides security. Finally the need for sexual

education and easy access to counselling services is apparent in order to

promote optimal contraception decision-making.

Scroll to Top