Scientific programme
: presentations and abstracts
 |
=Powerpoint Presentation |  |
=abstract |
| Note: All presentations and abstracts
open in a new window. Download time depends of speed of your connection to internet as well as speed of the processor of your computer. |
|||
|
CONTRACEPTIVE PRACTICE IN EUROPE: DIFFERENCES IN AVAILABILITY AND ACCESSIBILITY |
|
7th ESC SEMINAR September 12 – 13, 2003 Budapest, Hungary |
| Programme
overview |
|
Friday, September 12, 2003 INTERNATIONAL PART OF THE SEMINAR Accessibility and Acceptability of Contraceptive Methods in Europe |
| Saturday, September 13, 2003 INTERNATIONAL PART OF THE SEMINAR |
| HUNGARIAN PART OF THE SEMINAR |
| POSTER
AWARD WINNERS |
|
September 12, 2003 INTERNATIONAL PART OF THE SEMINAR |
||
|
Plenary sessions, English spoken with simultaneous translation to Hungarian |
||
|
|
and Acceptability of Contraceptive Methods in Europe |
|
|
Chairmen: S.Skouby (Denmark) – D.Rebelo (Portugal) |
||
|
|
|
Contraceptives in Europe, accessibility and availability |
|
(994kB) |
M.Lech (Poland) |
|
|
|
Should OC be OTC? |
|
|
(467kB) |
A.Yeshaya (Israel) |
|
|
|
What about men? |
|
|
(82,5kB) |
I.Savelieva (Russia) |
|
|
|
Enforced sterilisation? |
|
|
J.J.Amy (Belgium) |
||
|
|
|
Community based services |
|
(134,5kB) |
S.Ozalp (Turkey) |
|
|
|
||
|
|
Accessibility and Acceptability of Abortions in Europe |
|
|
Chairmen: A.Verougstraete (Belgium) – A.Szilágyi (Hungary) |
||
|
|
|
Abortions in Europe, accessibility and availability |
|
(575,5kB) |
B.Pinter (Slovenia) |
|
|
|
Characteristics and history of women having repeat abortions |
|
|
(306,5kB) |
I.Savelieva (Russia) |
|
|
|
|
Medical abortions at home? |
|
(336,5kB) |
E.Aubény (France) |
|
|
|
||
|
Workshops (conclusions in word-documents) |
||
|
|
1. How do we reach those who don’t access standard services? |
|
|
Chairmen: V.Bruni (Italy) – A.Nandor (Hungary) |
||
|
|
2. Does cost affect availability and accessibility? |
|
|
Chairmen: A.Szilagyi (Hungary) – A.Borsos (Hungary) |
||
|
|
3. Post abortion contraception, does it affect the repeat abortion
|
|
|
Chairmen: O.Loeber (The Netherlands) – I.Batar (Hungary) |
||
|
|
4. Does the method of abortion affect acceptability? |
|
|
Chairmen: A.Pretnar-Darovec (Slovenia) – R.Póka (Hungary) |
||
|
|
||
