Effect of contraception on depression: comparison of Edinburgh and Beck depression scales

Effect of contraception on depression: comparison of Edinburgh and Beck

depression scales

K. Ertopçu, M. Inal, A. Dönmez, I. Ergin, S. Yetkin, S. Vardar, Ö.

Biçer, I. Özelmas

Family Planning Department, Izmir, Turkey

Objective: To evaluate the satisfaction from contraceptive method use

and depression of women with undesired pregnancies together with comparison of

Edinburgh and Beck depression scales.

Material and Methods: Cases applied to our family planning clinic in

between 15.12.2003 and 15.01.2004 were divided into four groups and enrolled

into the study. Cases using none of the contraceptive methods and who applied

for a contraceptive method formed the first group. Cases using intrauterine

device (IUD) and who were satisfied with the method and under routine control

formed the second group. The third group was consisting of cases who were not

satisfied with IUD use. The fourth group was consisting of cases who had applied

for uterine evacuation. Cases using hormonal contraceptive methods were excluded

from the study. In order to evaluate the psychological status’ of all

applicants in the last one week, Edinburgh depression scale with 10 questions

and Beck depression scale with 21 questions were applied to all of the

applicants under accompaniment of a counselor nurse. The cut-off value

calculated for Edinburgh depression scale was 12/13. Points in between 0–13

represented no depression, points in between 14–24 represented medium

depression and points equal and over 25 represented serious depression in Beck

depression scale. Statistical data were evaluated with Pearson Chi-square test.

Results: Group 1 consisted of 40 cases and each of Group 2, Group 3

and Group 4 were consisted of 50 cases. Mean age of the cases was 32 years. 48%

of the cases had 2 children. 83% of the cases were primary school graduates and

74% of the cases had no desire for more children, and only 11.6% of the cases

were in premenstrual period. According to Edinburgh depression scale, 47.4% of

all cases were depressive, whereas according to Beck depression scale, 27.4% of

the cases were under medium depression and 12.6% of the cases were under serious

depression. Depression was observed more frequently in women with undesired

pregnancies with a rate of 76% after evaluation of the both scales. As an

unexpected result, the minimum depression rate observed with unsatisfied IUD

users was, 28% in Edinburgh scale and 30% in Beck scale. The depression rates

observed with applicants for new contraceptive method were 40% in Edinburgh

scale and 32.5% in Beck scale. The depression rates of the cases satisfied with

IUD use were 44% in Edinburgh scale and 30% in Beck scale.

Conclusions: Depression observed in applicants for undesired

pregnancies shows the importance of contraception in women. Edinburgh and Beck

depression scales pointed out correlation only in between two groups. Whereas

correlation was not observed with Beck scale in other two groups when cut-off

value of Edinburgh scale was set as 12.

Scroll to Top